Peer review process
All manuscripts will be subject to editorial reviews and double-blind peer reviews. Manuscripts that do not meet the criteria for inclusion or are inappropriate will be rejected without external review. Manuscripts deemed worthy of inclusion in the Jurnal Sabhanga are submitted for formal review. Typically, two experts review each manuscript, but they may be subject to further examination if more specific advice is needed in terms of statistics or techniques. Based on reviewer comments, editors will then accept or reject manuscripts with the following conditions: (1) Accept and publish, with or without editorial revision, (2) Invite authors to revise their manuscripts and address certain issues, (3) Reject such articles directly, usually on the grounds of lack of originality, inadequate conceptual progression or major technical and/or interpretation issues. Any changes made to the original manuscript will be clearly stated for review by the author. The authors should carefully examine the sentence structure, completeness, and accuracy of the text, references, tables, and graphic content of the revised manuscript. The Editor-in-Chief will have a final decision regarding the acceptance or rejection of the manuscript. The Editorial Board reserves the right to edit articles on all aspects of style, format, and clarity. Manuscripts with excessive errors in any aspect, i.e. spelling or punctuation, the word count will be returned to the author for revision before being resentful or can be rejected entirely.
Jurnal Sabhanga welcomes the reviewers' recommendations on editing prospective texts, but in the case of conflicting suggestions from reviewers, editors will make a final decision on action. The editor will evaluate the reports of each reviewer, relevant comments made by the author, and other information that may not be available to either party before reaching a decision. The primary responsibility of Jurnal Sabhanga is for our readers and the scientific community at large, and in deciding how best to serve them, we must assess the validity and reliability of each manuscript against many others that are also being considered. We may return to reviewers for further advice, especially in cases where they disagree with each other, or where the author believes they have been misunderstood at certain points. Therefore, reviewers should be willing to provide follow-up advice when requested. Editors are aware that reviewers may be reluctant to be drawn into protracted disputes and will continue to consult to the minimum we think is necessary to provide a fair hearing for the author. When reviewers agree to rate a manuscript, the editor considers this to be a commitment to review the next revision if necessary and the editor will not send the manuscript back to the reviewer if it appears that the author has not made any serious effort to address the initial issue. Jurnal Sabhanga takes feedback and criticism from critics seriously, especially editors who are very reluctant to ignore technical criticism. In cases where one reviewer alone opposes publication, the editor may consult with other reviewers as to whether he or she is applying an overly critical standard. Editors can sometimes bring in additional reviewers to resolve disputes but we prefer not to do so unless there are specific issues, such as specialist technical issues.
Jurnal Sabhanga published twice a year in January and July
Open Access Policy
It is an open-access journal that provides direct worldwide barrier-free access to the full text of all published articles at no cost for access. Readers have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full text of all articles in Jurnal Sabhanga.
Authorship and plagiarism
The text of the article should be limited to those who have contributed sufficiently to take public responsibility for its contents. These contributions include (a) conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, or both; (b) draft articles or revise them critically for important intellectual content; (c) final approval of the version to be issued; and (d) consent to be responsible for all aspects of the work by ensuring that questions relating to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are properly investigated and resolved appropriately. Submission to Sabhanga Journal is defined by the journal which means that all registered authors have agreed with all article content. The appropriate author (submitting) is responsible for ensuring that this agreement has been reached, and for managing all communications between the journal and co-authors before and after publication. Any request for a change in the author list after submissions, such as a change in the author's order, or deletion or addition of the author must be accompanied by a letter signed by all original authors. The letter must be scanned and sent by e-mail to the email@example.com by the author who sent it. The editors of Jurnal Sabhanga assume that in multi-group collaborations, one member of each collaboration, usually the most senior member of each sending group has accepted responsibility for contributions to the script from their team.
The responsibility of the author concerned to ensure that:
1. This article is original work and does not involve fraud, fabrication, or plagiarism.
2. The article has never been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. If accepted by Jurnal Sabhanga , the article will not be submitted for publication in other journals.
3. This article does not contain defamatory or unlawful statements and does not contain any material that violates individual privacy, proprietary rights, or copyright under any law.
4. They have written permission from the owner for any excerpts of the copyrighted work that include and have credited the source from which they were obtained.
5. All authors have made significant contributions to research including conception and article design, data analysis, and scriptwriting.
6. All authors have reviewed the manuscript, are responsible for its contents, and agree to its publication.
7. All authors are aware of and agree to the terms of this publishing agreement.
Jurnal Sabhanga follows guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in dealing with all aspects of publication ethics and, in particular, how to handle research cases and publication violations. All articles in this journal involving human subjects must respect the ethical principles of research as described in the Helsinki Declaration and studies involving animals must adhere to the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research as developed by the Council for International Organization of Medical Sciences (CIOMS).
Jurnal Sabhanga adapts COPE to meet high-quality ethical standards for publishers, editors, writers, and reviewers. As an important issue, the ethics of publication need to be clearly explained to improve the quality of research around the world. In this section, we explain the standards for editors, writers, and reviewers. In addition, publishers have no right to interfere with the integrity of the content and only support publishing in a timely manner.
Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): JURNAL SABHANGA